People v. Brosnan
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Wachtler, J. (dissenting).
An attempt to apply the laws of search and seizure to this case illustrates the confusion which exists in that body of our law. Certain of our New York decisions have been invalidated by recent Supreme Court decisions,1 and we find little consistency in the Federal standards which are, at .best, muddled. We should not seek clear cut rules at the expense of constitutional safeguards (Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 483), but on the other hand, we should not be compelled to wander endlessly through this labyrinth of judicial uncertainty.
In determining when a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.