Legal Opinion

Farrow v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1996No. A96A1513PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Lavarne Farrow appeals his conviction by a jury of selling cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act.

1. On appeal, Farrow contends the trial court failed to grant his motion for new trial on the issue of entrapment. Farrow did not make any motion for directed verdict, and by his motion for new trial he did not raise any error at trial regarding his entrapment defense. Therefore, assuming, without deciding, that this enumeration raises a sufficiency of the evidence argument we find that sufficient evidence was presented to allow a jury to find Farrow guilty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Pontoon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Venable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Odom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Berman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API