Legal Opinion
Whelan v. Teledyne Metalworking Products
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 15, 2007No. 06-1460UnpublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRODY, District Judge.
Appellant Edward Whelan suffers from a degenerative eye disease that occludes his central vision. Whelan sued his former employer, Teledyne Metalworking Products, for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. The case went to trial, and the jury found for Teledyne. Challenging the sufficiency of the evidence underlying the verdict, Whelan moved for judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 50(b), or in the alternative, for a new trial under to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 59. The District Court denied Whelan’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Edward R. Williams Angelynne Williams, H/w v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Police Department, Edward R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Dennis E. Gaul v. Lucent Technologies Inc. John Does 1-100 Jane Does 1-100 Abc Corp. Xyz CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Michael A. Mengine v. Marvin Runyon, Post Master General, U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Garner v. School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Bluebeard's Castle, Inc. v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
- Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- BROWN v. WILSONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- DZURYACHKO v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.