Legal Opinion

State v. LaPierre

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 23, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Randolph LaPierre appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Aroos-took County, Pierson, J.) following a jury verdict convicting him of unlawful trafficking in scheduled drugs (Class B) in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103(2) (1983 & Supp.1998) amended by P.L.1999, ch. 374, §§ 1 & 2, and conspiracy to traffick in scheduled drugs (Class C) in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 151 (1983). LaPierre contends that the court erred in instructing the jury on lesser included trafficking offenses, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 13-A (1983), after originally instructing the jury only on the Class B trafficking…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. United States v. Roger WelbeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. State v. BeginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. State v. VarneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. State v. FitchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Adam DelanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. State v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  3. State of Arizona v. Eslyn Adrian VillaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State v. LaPierreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. State v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API