Legal Opinion
Schwinder v. Wilson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 17, 1987No. 86-1129PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Appellee’s filing of a counterclaim fulfilled the contractual provision that entitled the seller to recover attorney’s fees if she were compelled to take “legal action to enforce” the contract. See Richmond v. Lumb, 339 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. See Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, P.A. v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, PA v. AlvarezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Richmond v. LumbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rose v. Gaglioti & HonkoninCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991