State v. Pam
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
The defendant was found guilty by a jury of the crime of robbery. He appeals and assigns as error the determination of the court that he knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel at a lineup, and to the court’s refusal to submit this factual issue to the jury. Error is also assigned to the giving of an instruction on alibi and to the refusal of the court to grant a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence.
Isaac Pam allegedly took a purse from an elderly woman in an area close to his home. The victim was unable to positively identify the defendant. However, he was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Ronald Maurice Stump v. John Bennett, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary, Fort Madison, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Buckley v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. CrudupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State v. BernsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Corbin v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.