Peters v. McLaren
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio; J ohn E. Sater, Judge. Suit in equity by Caroline E. Peters, as administratrix de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate of George M. Peters, deceased, against Daniel McEafen, receiver of the Columbus Buggy Company, Valentine & Co., and the Columbus Buggy Company. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals.
1Per curiam
At the suit of Valentine & Co. against the Columbus Buggy Company, Daniel McLaren was appointed receiver of the Columbus Buggy Company, and appellant by intervention sought to recover the property in the hands of the receiver, claiming that such property was a trust fund belonging to appellant because of a partnership contract between appellant’s testator and one Clinton D. Firestone, and because of the particular manner in which certain of the partnership property passed to the Columbus Buggy Company, a corporation in which Firestone was the controlling stockholder. Two grounds of defense…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Walker v. TuckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1923
- Provident Life & Acc. Ins. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Rogers v. KinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Stabler v. RamsayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
- Sunmount Co. v. BynnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.