Legal Opinion

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Holroyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1937No. 27217PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

This was an action on a life insurance policy, by the beneficiary thereof. The defense was nonpayment of the first annual premium, and the trial court placed upon the defendant insurance company the burden of proving such nonpayment. In appealing the defendant asserts that this was error, and that, instead, the burden of proof should have been placed upon the plaintiff to show the payment of said first annual premium.

The policy recited that receipt of payment of the first annual premium was acknowledged. As to where the burden of proof lies on the issue of payment or nonpayment of premiums…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. Security Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Mutual Life Ins. v. VaughanMississippi Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peters v. American Income Life Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Herndon v. Massachusetts General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
  3. Hughes v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. In Re HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API