Commonwealth v. Estes
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Perry
— Certifying the law.
On April 13, 1936, the defendants, Robert -Estes and Sonny Rose, were called for trial in the Clark circuit court under an indictment charging them with the offense of grand larceny.
Demurrers were interposed to the indictment, which were sustained by the court, and the indictment dismissed.
The commonwealth, complaining of the court’s ruling, has appealed, asking a certification of the law as to the sufficiency of the dismissed indictment.
The challenged indictment accused the defendants, Estes and Rose, of the crime of grand larceny. No…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Elliott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Commonwealth v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Commonwealth v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Commonwealth v. NealCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Estes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Thomas v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996