Legal Opinion
In re Heidi Construction Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames W. Bailey, J.
The lienor makes application to amend its notice of lien nunc pro tunc pursuant to the provisions of section 12-a of the Lien Law. The owner makes an application to vacate the notice of lien upon the ground that it fails to state the true owner and to adequately describe the property subject to the lien.
The lienor has failed to give the notice required by section 12-a of the Lien Law and its application is denied without prejudice to a further application upon proper notice within 10 days of the entry of an order hereon. Such application may *59seek an amendment of the description but may not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re Thomas J. Dorsey, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Piscitell v. CaccamoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Upstate Builders Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- In re Upstate Builders Supply Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Lo Forte v. OmelNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Marshall Construction Co. v. Brookdale Hospital CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Maple Knoll Apartments, Inc. v. Upstate Builders Supply Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970