Earl Gene Tomlin v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections and the State of Texas
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The petitioner’s primary contention is that the procedure for establishing recidivism under the Texas Punishment Enhancement Statutes (Habitual Offender Acts) is unconstitutional. Tomlin argues that the procedure violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in that, through the indictment and evidence of prior convictions, the state informs jurors of such convictions before they determine his guilt of the primary offense. The Supreme Court has now settled this issue adversely to petitioner. Spencer v. State of Texas, 1967, 385 U.S. 554, 87 S.Ct. 648, 17 L.Ed.2d 606.
Tomlin also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- William Everett Reed v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. BrawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- United States v. Arthur Michael NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- People v. TenorioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.