Legal Opinion
Airhawk International LLC v. Air Seat Innovations LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 4, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01068Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 AIRHAWK INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Case No.: 3:23-cv-1068-AGS-BLM 4 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 8) 5 v. 6 AIR SEAT INNOVATIONS LLC, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 9 Plaintiff alleges that defendants infringed on its registered trademarks and patents. 10 Defendants’ motion to dismiss those claims fails, except in two respects. First, the 11 patent-infringement claim must be dismissed for improper venue. Second, the claims 12 against the individual defendant owner go awry for lack of personal jurisdiction and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.