Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1981No. Claim 61891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to defendant State of New York, by dismissing claimant’s cause of action for abuse of process and, as so modified, affirmed. The question certified is answered in the negative.

The threshold inquiry in regard to claimant’s cause of action for abuse of process is whether that claim is timely under subdivision 3 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act, which provides: “3. A claim to recover damages for injuries to property or for personal injury caused by the tort of an officer or employee of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keller v. ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pinter v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Trayer v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Kahn v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Beninati v. NicotraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Karen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API