Legal Opinion

Karstens v. Karstens

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for construction of a -will.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

Upon this application to the court for the construction of the will of Gerhard H. Karstens,. the main controversy arises between the plaintiff, who is a son of the deceased and his sole surviving executor and trustee, and the defendant Catherine Karstens, who is the widow of another son, Herman Karstens, deceased. That question is whether Catherine Karstens takes the portion which would have been the share of her husband Herman Karstens if he had lived, or whether that share goes to the plaintiff as the sole surviving son of the testator.

The material parts of the will are here quoted, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shipman v. . RollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. King v. PaddockNew York Supreme Court · 1820
  4. Sheldon v. FerrisNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Clark v. . OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MatthewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912
  2. In re the Application for Letters of Administration upon the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912
  3. In re the Appointment of an Administrator in the Estate of SullivanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of DavenportNew York Surrogate's Court · 1902
  5. McQuillan v. McQuillanNew York Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API