Legal Opinion
Guinn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1915No. 3736PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Frank Guinn and J. J. Beal. Judgment of conviction, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were defendants in the District Court and will be hereafter so styled here. They were charged with a violation of section 19 of the Criminal Code, which is as follows:
“Sec. 19. If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same, or if two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Guinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State v. Ledford.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Luteran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937