Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided April 25, 1991No. 10-90-043-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CUMMINGS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a default judgment in a bail bond forfeiture case. Appellants, principal and sureties on the bond, claim the citation was defective and that attorney’s fees and interest were not proper. We will reverse and render judgment.

In the first point of error, Appellants claim the citations did not notify Appellants to appear and show cause why the judgment nisi of bond forfeiture should not be made final.

The statutory provisions concerning citations in bond forfeitures are found in Articles 22.03 and 22.04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which provide…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eddie Blue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Blue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Bailout Bonding Co. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Pitts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Fidelity Insurance Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Hernden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  3. Davie Westmoreland, D/B/A Allegheny Casualty Co., and Allegheny Casualty Company v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  4. Olivarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  5. Olivarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API