Legal Opinion
Figueroa v. Hernandez
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nicholas Figueroa, J.
Petitioner seeks a judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 declaring that respondents’ failure to entertain and determine his claim that he is entitled to remaining family member status *414at respondents’ housing facility, where he now resides, is arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law. However, this claim is now academic, “as on November 27, 2002, subsequent to the petition’s filing, respondents notified petitioner in writing that he would not be accorded remaining family member status.” The denial also informs petitioner that he is not entitled to a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ritt v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Tyson v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Faison v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mears v. Chrysler Financial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- 31171 Owners Corp. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McLaughlin v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- McLaughlin v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- McLaughlin v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004