Legal Opinion

Arbo v. State Bank of Elberta

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1932No. 1 Div. 736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, X

The question in this case is whether the failure to comply with the statute of non-claim (section 5815, Code) prevents the enforcement of the lien provided for in section 7000, in favor of a corporation against its stockholders on their shares of stock to collect a debt for borrowed money. The suit is in equity, and the claim was not filed or presented so as to comply with section 5815, Code. The chancery court held that the lien is enforceable on the stock.

Appellant seeks to apply a distinction drawn in some of the cases between a lien created by law and one created by contract, in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doe ex dem Duval's heirs v. McLoskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  2. Halfman's v. Ellison & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  3. Long v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Smith v. GillamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Phillips v. Ash's Heirs & Adm'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Foster v. FeatherstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Planters' Warehouse & Commission Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Minor Heights Fire Dist. v. SkinnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Dirago v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API