Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Fluor Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2013No. ED 98462Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Appellants appeal the trial court’s judgment approving a class action settlement in favor of Herculaneum residents whose real property was affected by the Doe Run lead smelter. We affirm.

Background

Appellants are 28 objectors in a class of over 700 Plaintiffs (collectively, the Class) who suffered nuisance and damage to their real property as a result of toxins emitted from Doe Run. The Class is represented by six named Plaintiffs (the Representa-fives). Defendants are entities and executives associated with the smelter.

The Doe Run smelter was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Wilkerson v. PrelutskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Joel A. v. GiulianiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re General Tire And Rubber Company Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Plubell v. Merck & Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API