Legal Opinion
Hall Laboratories, Inc. v. National Aluminate Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 24, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 1192PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
The complaint is for declaratory judgment by plaintiffs who are four corporations under the same management, against defendant, National Alumínate Corporation, which owns U. S. Patent 2,358,222, known as the Fink-Richardson patent, relating to the art of treating water. Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring plaintiffs are relieved of their obligations under the non-exclusive and non-transferable license under the patent, granted to them by Nalco on January 29, 1948.
The license agreement1 2was part of a settlement of previous litigation between the parties in this court. In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- E-I-M Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Gear Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Hall Laboratories, Incorporated, the Buromin Company, Calgon, Incorporated, and Hagan Corporation v. National Aluminate CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Hall Laboratories, Incorporated, the Buromin Company, Calgon, Incorporated, and Hagan Corporation v. National Aluminate CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955