Holt v. Bergevin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho
At Law. On motion to remand. Action by Samuel it. Holt and otters against Louis Bergevin and others.
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, District Judge.
The complainants have moved to remand the cause. Their claims — each of which is less than $2,000, but aggregate over that sum — are for labor performed by them for defendants, against whom they ask judgment, and for a lien upon property to secure the judgment. The claim of each complainant rests upon Ms separate contract. It must be supported by separate testimony, and any judgment recovered must be, in effect, several, for each complainant, for the amount found due him. The complainants have joined their several separate causes of action in one suit, through the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Clay v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Davies v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BonceletNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- EA Coronis Assocs. v. M. Gordon Constr. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- State v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Shafer v. HB Thomas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Feaster v. Old Security Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.