Legal Opinion

Continental Distilling Corp. v. Shultz

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 29, 1972No. 72-1547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Prior to July 1, 1972, domestic whis-ky, aged in used oak casks, i. e., reused cooperage, was required to be marketed with a label which advised that it had been aged in that manner, for the number of years also indicated.1 The regulations so providing had been promulgated under the labeling provisions of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act.2 This Act is administered under the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury, a present appellant, and the officials of the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Division of the Internal Revenue Service who are also appellants.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Gibson Wine Co., Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LaceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1980
  2. Continental Distilling Corporation v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API