Miller v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶ 15. Because the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Wade Miller was guilty of arson, I respectfully dissent.
¶ 16. The plurality relies on the Court of Appeals' conclusion that the following evidence was consistent with the guilty verdict rendered against Miller:(1) Miller was the sole occupant of the trailer, (2) a telephone call was made from the trailer approximately ten minutes before the fire was reported, (3) Miller was the last person known to be at the trailer, (4) a car was seen leaving the vicinity of Miller's trailer shortly before the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Isaac v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Moody v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Holloman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- White v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.