Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 2009No. 4D08-3489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s conviction of grand theft and his sentence as an habitual felony offender. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of a motion for continuance shortly before the commencement of trial. See Lawson v. State, 884 So.2d 540, 545-46 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); McKay v. State, 504 So.2d 1280, 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We remand to the circuit court to correct the scrivener’s error in the judgment of conviction, which indicates that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere, rather than correctly showing that appellant was found guilty after a jury trial.

GROSS,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Lawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Villanueva v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Herrin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API