Legal Opinion

Paul Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 13, 1998No. 01C01-9712-CC-00578PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARY R. WADE, Presiding Judge.'

The petitioner, Paul Dan Smith, appeals the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. The single issue for review is whether the trial court erred by concluding that the petitioner had knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

In 1996, the petitioner was indicted on four counts of burglary, three counts of theft, five counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, coercion of a witness, passing a worthless check, and felony escape. On September 12, 1996, the petitioner, pro se, entered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Clenny v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  4. United States v. William Stewart McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lovin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jamarces J. Watson v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  3. James Byron Transou v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Jerry Hardcastle v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Luther Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API