Kaplan v. Loev

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

The court below sustained objections to certain questions proposed to be put to two of defendant’s witnesses by plaintiffs’ attorney in cross-examining them. The trial resulted in a yerdict and judgment for defendant. These appeals are by plaintiffs, who assign as error the refusal of the court to allow the questions.

The details of the collision between the automobile in which plaintiffs were riding and defendant’s automobile which give rise to the suit need not be stated. It is sufficient to say that defendant claimed he was not negligent and the witnesses to…