Legal Opinion

State v. Pace

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 2, 1935No. 33546PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

Theo. Pace, R. C. Logue, and Frank Carney were charged with the offense of breaking and entering in the nighttime. The defendants were granted a severance, but on the day fixed for the trial of the three cases, it was agreed by counsel that Theo. Pace and Frank Carney should be tried together. The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty against both defendants. From the verdict against him and the sentence imposed thereunder, Theo. Pace prosecutes this appeal. The record contains eight bills of exception.

Bill No. 1 was taken to the admissibility of the testimony of R. C. Logue,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CullensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. State v. NahoumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. State v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. State v. CiaccioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. FallonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. State v. SearleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  4. State v. GoinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  5. State v. FrentzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API