Legal Opinion
Holland Livestock Ranch v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1983No. CA 82-4309PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the government’s “access trespass” presumption suffices to prove trespass. The district court held that the presumption was invalid and granted summary judgment for Holland. We affirm.
This is the latest in a series of cattle grazing disputes between appellees Holland Livestock Ranch and John Casey (together “Holland”) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). ■ The Holland ranch holds grazing permits for some public lands. The ranch also adjoins other public lands closed to grazing. The BLM believed that Holland’s cattle were trespassing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- The F & D Property Co., a Corporation, and Fred M. Winner, Receiver v. James H. Alkire and Younker Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- The Kissell Company v. Forrest Gressley and Emily Gressley, Husband and Wife, and Mountain View Garden ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Los Angeles New HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Holland Livestock Ranch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Department of Transportation and United States of America, the Fertilizer Institute, Intervenor ForCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Ram v. Infinity Select InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Holland Livestock Ranch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983