Legal Opinion

Allemannia Fire Insurance v. Keller Diamond Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue submitted to the jury was whether in entrusting the diamond ring to defendant, Zimet & Company was agent for Mrs. Gottlieb or was acting in its own behalf. We are of the view that the answer of the jury that Zimet & Company in delivering the ring to defendant was acting not for itself but as agent for Mrs. Gottlieb, is fairly supportable on the evidence. In the circumstances the complaint should not have been dismissed and the verdict of the jury should have been permitted to stand.

The judgment dismissing the complaint should be reversed and judgment should be entered in favor of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SlifkinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1961
  2. Lipschutz v. Gordon Jewelry CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
  3. Hartog v. MehleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API