Legal Opinion
PDR Development Corp. v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1995No. 15470PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
PDR Corporation appeals an order denying its counterclaim for money damages on a theory of inverse condemnation. PDR’s brief attacks the trial court’s findings that the City of Santa Fe’s actions did not cause its damages. Rather than focus on the narrow attack on the findings, we consider this case in broader perspective. In essence, PDR’s contention is that it was entitled to damages in the form of lost profits for loss of contracts to sell the property resulting from the erroneous application of a zoning ordinance by the City. PDR makes this claim under either the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Primetime Hospitality, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Sunland Park v. Santa Teresa Services Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Albuquerque v. SMP Props., LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
- Primetime Hospitality, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- PRIMETIME v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.