Legal Opinion

Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. McCray

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J. (after stating the facts).

It will be noted that the covenant or policy sued on provided that it shall not be contested for suicide. The defendant was a fraternal insurance company, and one of its by-laws provided that “suicide, or death by one’s own hands, whether sane or insane, should not be contested,” etc.

In Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. Compton, 140 Ark. 313, it was held that the constitution and by-laws of a fraternal insurance company become a part of the contract of insurance so as to bind the insured, provided they are not inconsistent with the terms of the contract. This rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Berkshire Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hope Spoke Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. AkensSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. ComptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Missouri State Life Insurance v. CranfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Acme Life Ins. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Importers' & Exporters' Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Great American Casualty Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Fidelity Benefit Ass'n v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API