Taylor v. Gardiner
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The only question argued by the appellant is whether the annuity given to Elizabeth K. Gardiner, niece of the testator, by paragraph “A” of the trust set forth in the sixth item of the will of John P. Hazlett, late of Boston, became payable out of principal when the income proved *412insufficient. The Probate Court has held that the annuity is chargeable upon income alone and that resort cannot be had to the principal to make up past deficiencies. We incline to the view that this ruling was right.
The sixth item of the will establishes a trust of the entire residue of the estate for purposes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cummings v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Parkhurst v. GinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Richardson v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Smith v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Bridge v. BridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Byrne v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Lynn Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Schloesser v. SchloesserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946