Flory v. Flory
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
This appeal presents the issue of whether the income from a child’s guardianship account, established in settlement of a tort claim of the child, can be used to meet his support needs. We hold that such use of the income is improper unless the court determines that his parents are unable to provide for his support out of their own resources.
Plaintiff-appellant, Mary A. Flory, and defendant-appel-lee, Paul Thomas Flory, were married on August 30, 1970. Four children were born during the marriage: Paul, age 14; Joseph, age 12; Margaret, age 10; and Jacob, age 8. The parties…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ulmer v. SommervilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Shuster v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hagerty v. EysterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cunningham v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Labar v. LabarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ricco v. NovitskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Bibbee v. State ex rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Bomberger v. Bomberger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.