Legal Opinion

Mandell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 1979No. 77-328, CA 12765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

The issue in this Workers’ Compensation case is whether claimant suffered an aggravation of his condition. 1 The referee denied further benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) found that claimant’s condition had not been medically stationary when closed, so it set aside the Determination Order and granted compensation from the date of injury until the claim was closed "pursuant to provisions of ORS 656.268”. 2 We reinstate the order of the referee.

On July 1, 1976, claimant, a school custodian, aged 44, used a cleansing product which produced hydrochloric acid fumes while he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. SeufertOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Parker v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gormley v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Liberty M & Saif Corp. v. Lynch Co. (In re Comp. of Alcorn)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Port of Portland Ocip v. CierniakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Neal's Truck Stop v. GigerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API