Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Barrand

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

In this stockholder’s derivative action, the defendant Manufacturers Trading Corporation moves to compel the plaintiff to post security under section 61-b of the General Corporation Law, as amended by chapter 869 of the Laws of 1945. The action was pending at the time of the enactment of section 61-b and, except for the 1945 amendment, falls within the decision of the Court of Appeals in Shielcrawt v. Moffett *434(294 N. Y. 180) holding that section 61-b does not apply to actions pending when it went into effect. This defendant’s point on the present motion is that the 1945 amendment makes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shielcrawt v. MoffettNew York Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Purdy v. HumphreyNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Mahler v. Trico Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API