Legal Opinion

Feltus v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1999No. 99-C-1153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| ¶WALTZER, Judge.

Defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, seeks review through supervisory jurisdiction of the trial court’s denial of its peremptory exception of prescription. Allstate argues that a prescriptive period of one year applies to Feltus’ claims under an *273insurance policy issued by Allstate and insuring Feltus’ property against certain losses, including theft.1

FACTS

In the early days of August 1995, Feltus’ residence was burglarized. He filed a claim for the stolen property with Allstate. On 30 October 1995, Allstate notified Fel-tus that it denied coverage for the loss.

On 22…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Grice v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. Beazor-Williams v. St. Paul Fire & MarineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maurice v. Prudential Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Camellia Condominium Association Inc. v. United Specialty Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API