Feltus v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
| ¶WALTZER, Judge.
Defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, seeks review through supervisory jurisdiction of the trial court’s denial of its peremptory exception of prescription. Allstate argues that a prescriptive period of one year applies to Feltus’ claims under an *273insurance policy issued by Allstate and insuring Feltus’ property against certain losses, including theft.1
FACTS
In the early days of August 1995, Feltus’ residence was burglarized. He filed a claim for the stolen property with Allstate. On 30 October 1995, Allstate notified Fel-tus that it denied coverage for the loss.
On 22…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Grice v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Beazor-Williams v. St. Paul Fire & MarineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maurice v. Prudential Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Camellia Condominium Association Inc. v. United Specialty Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022