Disclosure of Parolees' Names to Local Police
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel
1Opinion of the Court
Disclosure of Parolees’ Names to Local Police U nited States Parole C o m m ission’s proposed disclosure of inform ation on parolees to local law enforcem ent authorities could be justified as a “ routine u se” under the Privacy A ct. However, in a case where there is no reason to suspect the involvem ent of a particular individual in crim inal activity, such blanket disclosure could be challenged as an unw arranted expansion of the “ routine u se” exception. March 26, 1982 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL This responds to your request for our opinion whether the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Thomas B. Miller, Sr., A/K/A Crosby L. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Harper v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
- Local 2047, American Federation of Government Employees v. Defense General Supply CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Bradley Arnold Ash v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Burley v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.