Legal Opinion

Disclosure of Parolees' Names to Local Police

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided March 26, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

Disclosure of Parolees’ Names to Local Police U nited States Parole C o m m ission’s proposed disclosure of inform ation on parolees to local law enforcem ent authorities could be justified as a “ routine u se” under the Privacy A ct. However, in a case where there is no reason to suspect the involvem ent of a particular individual in crim inal activity, such blanket disclosure could be challenged as an unw arranted expansion of the “ routine u se” exception. March 26, 1982 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL This responds to your request for our opinion whether the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas B. Miller, Sr., A/K/A Crosby L. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Harper v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
  3. Local 2047, American Federation of Government Employees v. Defense General Supply CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  4. Bradley Arnold Ash v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Burley v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API