Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Conard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1976No. 1023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment denying a petition for bill of review. The appellant, Charles H. Griffith, sought by bill of review filed February 3, 1975, to set aside a default judgment taken against him on November 26, 1974, by Virgil Warren Conard and Ben D. Marks. The original suit was brought by Conard and Marks to recover delinquent rental payments due under a written lease agreement. Although personally served with citation, Griffith failed to file an answer, a motion for new trial or writ of error. All parties moved for summary judgment upon the bill…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Cooper v. Texas Gulf Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gracey v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rundle v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  2. Pierce v. Terra Mar Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Hildyard v. Fannel Studio, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Hildyard v. Fannel Studio, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Joanne Barnwell v. Gregory D. Eversole, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API