Legal Opinion

LaFiosca v. LaFiosca

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert A. Bruno, J.

It is ordered that this motion is decided as follows:

Plaintiff seeks an order: (1) pursuant to CPLR 2221, granting plaintiff, Rebecca LaFiosca, leave to renew and/or reargue the determination of this court (Robert A. Bruno, J.) dated November 19, 2010, finding the parties’ postnuptial agreement effective, and upon renewal and/or reargument; (2) directing the defendant to pay plaintiff nontaxable maintenance in the sum of $500 per week pursuant to the terms of the parties’ postnuptial agreement; (3) pursuant to CPLR 2221, granting plaintiff, Rebecca…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prichep v. PrichepAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Bloomfield v. BloomfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Jorgensen v. JorgensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Maders v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Rebeil Consulting Corp. v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API