Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 2002No. C037880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

The City of Sacramento (the City) seeks a writ of review to overturn a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) which held that an employee, Eric Saylors, was eligible as a “fire recruit” for enhanced benefits under Labor Code section 4850.

Section 4850 provides for a leave of absence at full salary in lieu of temporary disability payments for public safety employees, including firefighters, who become disabled in the course of employment. The City contends fire recruits do not engage in firefighting and are not entitled to section 4850…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Save Mart Stores v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Biggers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Charles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Burns v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. County of Nevada v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Hernandez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API