Legal Opinion

James G. v. Thompson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This cause is brought by appeal, from the decision of the Chancellor of the State. The original bill was filed by the complainants, James G. and S. Hall, against the defendant, George A. Thompson, on thé 25th of October, A. D., 1838. It averred in substance, that on the 29th of November, 1836, the defendant executed to them a bond to make title to a tract of land; which bond is made exhibit A. to the bill.

Read the full summary

This cause is brought by appeal, from the decision of the Chancellor of the State. The original bill was filed by the complainants, James G. and S. Hall, against the defendant, George A. Thompson, on thé 25th of October, A. D., 1838. It averred in substance, that on the 29th of November, 1836, the defendant executed to them a bond to make title to a tract of land; which bond is made exhibit A. to the bill. The condition of which is as follows: “ The condition of the above obligation is such, that, whereas the above bound George A. Thompson hath this day sold unto Spence Hall and James G. Hall…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sharkey

The appellants contracted with the appellee for a tract of land in Yalobusha county, containing nine hundred acres, at twenty dollars per acre, for which they executed their three promissory notes for six thousand dollars each; the first, payable on the first of March, 1838, and the others payable annually thereafter. They took from the vendor a bond to make title, in the penalty of thirty-six thousand dollars, which bears date the 29th of November, 1836. It recites the contract of sale, and the condition is, that the vendor was to make to the vendees a good title, with covenants of warranty,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Ford v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Coe v. HuttonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1815
  4. Moore v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826
  5. Bullock v. BeemissCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1819

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. La Bau v. VanderbiltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879
  2. La Casa I, LLC and Eden Hasen Kerns v. Terri D. Gottfried and Robert J. GottfriedCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API