Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rauh

Putnam Circuit Court

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought originally in the probate court to contest a local option election in Putnam county, which county, on the face of the returns, was declared to have voted “dry” on the 13th of October, 1908.

Soon after filing the petition 'to contest the election a motion was also filed by the eontestors asking the probate judgeffo certify the case over to the court of common pleas on the' ground that he was prejudiced against the side of the eontestors "as shown by his activity in the campaign preceding the election'. The motion being overruled by the probate court, an action in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Young v. DuvallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Gardner v. HosmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  4. Brown v. FleischnerOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Richards v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. BayerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Thompson v. BayerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API