Riverdale Mining Co. v. Wicks
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. J. 0. Moncur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is a suit to quiet title to certain land situated in Plumas county.
Plaintiff obtained judgment, from which the defendant has taken this appeal.
The evidence from which the court made its findings of fact is undisputed, 'and may he epitomized as follows:
On and prior to the fourth day of October, 1907, one W. W. Kellogg was the owner of the property in controversy. On said fourth day of October, 1907, Kellogg and wife, by deed, conveyed said property to one Lloyd P. Cornell. Said deed was delivered to said Cornell on the day of its execution, and was recorded on the same day in the office…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brown v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- California Savings & Loan Society v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hays v. RegerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Charles Roome Parmele Co. v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- First Natl. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spear v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Cheek v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Iknoian v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Robson v. O'TooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Schriber v. Alameda County-East Bay Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.