Sweeney v. Kirby
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Dawn Kirby appeals from a district court order denying her motion to modify primary residential responsibility of the parties’ minor child from Brian Sweeney to her. We affirm, concluding the court’s denial of Kirby’s motion is not clearly erroneous.
I
[¶ 2] Kirby and Sweeney have one minor child together who was born in 2004. Kirby raised the child until 2011, when Sweeney was granted primary residential responsibility, and Kirby was granted supervised parenting time. In 2012, Kirby moved to modify primary residential responsibility. The district court’s order denying…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Sweeney v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Graner v. GranerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schweitzer v. MattingleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Weber v. PenningtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- N.P. v. M.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015