Legal Opinion
Siskey v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 261
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 25, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-788PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARSH, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Jerome R. Siskey, has filed this action against his employer, Eazor Express, Inc. (Eazor), and his labor union pursuant to Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. At issue are motions for summary judgment filed by Eazor and the union defendants, General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 261 (Local 261) and Teamsters Joint Council No. 40. In our opinion the motions should be granted.
Plaintiff asserts that Eazor breached its contractual duty with respect to the plaintiff’s seniority rights under the applicable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Findley v. Jones Motor FreightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- James J. Liotta, an Individual, in No. 79-2124 v. National Forge Company, in No. 79-2252Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Cole v. United Steelworkers of America, Local No. 4407District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Teamsters' Steel Haulers Local Union No. 800 v. Lakeshore Motor Freight Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.