Legal Opinion
Brady v. A Certain Teacher
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Oshrin, J.
The plaintiff, Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District, has commenced this action seeking judgment declaring that sections 3012 and 3020-a of the Education Law violate article VIII, section 1 of the New York Constitution insofar as they require a school board to pay salary, benefits and other emoluments of employment to a teacher who has been suspended and who is rendering no services during the pendency of disciplinary proceedings; further declaring that section 3015 of the Education Law requires that when a board of education suspends a teacher…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Donato v. Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- People v. Brian L.Watertown City Court · 2007
- McElroy v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 2004