Legal Opinion

Stedman v. Town of Osceola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spring, J.:

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to be sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the defective con*221dition of a highway in the defendant. The town of Osceola contains no village or city, has 600 inhabitants, forty-four miles of highways, and two-thirds- of the entire area of the town consists of uncultivated, unproductive land. The highway in question was in a sparsely-settled part of the town and infrequently traveled.

On the 15th of June; 1909, by direction of the town superintendent, this road its entire length was run over by the town road scraper and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glasier v. . Town of HebronNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Stedman v. The Town of OsceolaNew York Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hooker v. Town of HanoverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Kent v. Town of PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API