Legal Opinion
Pacific Lumber Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1990No. A049626PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
Petitioner Pacific Lumber Company seeks a writ of mandate to require respondent court to expunge a lis pendens which has been filed against petitioner’s real property in Humboldt County by real party in interest, Robert Martel. We agree that real party did not meet his burden of establishing that the action affects title to or right of possession of the real property and for that reason the lis pendens should have been expunged. (Code Civ. Proc., § 409.1.)
On March 26, 1990, Martel commenced this suit as a class action on behalf of the former shareholders of Pacific Lumber…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Coppinger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Gaillard v. Natomas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Calistoga Civic Club v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Communist Party of the United States of Amerika v. 522 Valencia, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Campbell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Goldberg v. Bank of Alex Brown (In Re Goldberg)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Tintocalis v. TintocalisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Santa Ana Unified School District v. Montgomery (In re Montgomery)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.