Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Kavanagh

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 29, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 7306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVIN, District Judge.

This action is brought for the recovery of an amount which the parties agree has been an overpayment of Federal estate tax, plus interest thereon. The only issue is whether the plaintiff’s cause of action is barred by the statute, Section 3772(a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code.1'

Suit was instituted more than two years from the mailing of a letter dated September 2, 1944, by the- Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the plaintiff, and the question is to be resolved by the determination of whether that letter constituted a “notice of the disallowance” within the meaning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  2. Commissioner v. Alldi's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Frazer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  4. Roe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sara Lee Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Beardsley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1954
  3. Peppers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API