Legal Opinion

United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Harris Methodist Fort Worth, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1992No. 91-1552PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) appeals from a ruling that a proposed Title VI compliance review of physician staff privileges at Harris Methodist Hospital-Fort Worth was a warrantless search that did not comport with Fourth Amendment standards of reasonableness. Harris Methodist cross-appeals the trial court’s ruling that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq. applies to physician staff privileges. We affirm, albeit on different reasoning from that of the district court.

BACKGROUND

Harris Methodist in Fort Worth,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Club Retro, L.L.C. v. HiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Vakharia v. Swedish Covenant HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. Carnell Construction Corp. v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Weekoty v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API